This post was published 150 days ago. The information described in this article may have changed.
This post is auto-generated from RSS feed
The Rust Programming Language Forum - Latest topics. Source:
Why are zero-sized clones of function items useful?
OP of an internals thread wrote:
I can see the value of being able to .clone() a function item and get a zero sized result, so the coercion shouldn't happen in all cases.
What is the practical use of zero-sized clones of function items in Rust? It seems that if it wasn't for such use cases, function items could automatically be coerced to function pointers by the compiler.
3 posts - 2 participants
Read full topic
🏷️ rust_feed
