We’ve just finished rewriting HandyCafe, a 20+ year old internet café management system from scratch in Rust.

The original system was developed in Delphi, heavily Windows-centric, stateful and evolved over decades with all the usual legacy complexity: shared mutable state, implicit assumptions, and increasingly fragile concurrency.

At some point, we realized incremental refactoring was no longer enough. We needed a clean foundation. So we made a hard decision: full rewrite.

Rust wasn’t chosen for hype. It was chosen because we needed:
• strict memory safety without a GC
• explicit ownership and lifetimes
• confidence in multi-threaded behavior under heavy load
• and long-term maintainability

During the process, a few things became very clear:
• The borrow checker is not an obstacle, it’s a design tool. It forced us to make state boundaries explicit and eliminate hidden coupling.
• Many race conditions we previously “handled in production” simply disappeared
because the compiler no longer allowed them to exist.
• Our architecture naturally became more modular because Rust makes it uncomfortable to write tangled code.
• Performance tuning shifted from guesswork to clarity. We now understand where costs actually are.

We also built the system with a Rust backend and a Tauri-based cross-platform UI (Windows, macOS, Linux), which allowed us to move away from our old platform constraints entirely.

So this is really just a thank you.

To the Rust language team, and to the community. You didn’t just build a language, you built a set of constraints that guide developers toward better systems.

If you’re maintaining a large legacy codebase and considering Rust:
the rewrite is the hard part. Rust is the part that makes it worth it.

Atilla Yurtseven

2 posts - 2 participants

Read full topic