This post was published 110 days ago. The information described in this article may have changed.
This post is auto-generated from RSS feed
The Rust Programming Language Forum - Latest topics. Source:
Can Pin>> violate the pin gurantee?
Since RefCell<T> allows for interior mutability, then obtaining a mut &T using RefCell::borrow_mut(), we can do a move via mem::replace(), and that too in (apparently) safe code; whereas documentation for Pin<T> states, that it isn't possible for safe code to obtain a reference to &mut T.
Intutively, it appears that it violates the pin gurantee; or, am I wrong here?
2 posts - 2 participants
Read full topic
🏷️ rust_feed
